2008 Baldrige ACTIONABLE Business, Public Sector and Other Nonprofit Criteria

Category 4: Measurement, Analysis, and Knowledge Management (90 pts.)

The Measurement, ANALYSIS, and Knowledge Management Category examines HOW your organization selects, gathers, ANALYZES, manages, and improves its data, information, and KNOWLEDGE ASSETS and HOW it manages its information technology. The Category also examines HOW your organization reviews and uses reviews to improve its PERFORMANCE.


Item 4.1: Measurement, Analysis, and Improvement of Organizational Performance

Item 4.1: Measurement, Analysis, and Improvement of Organizational Performance (45 pts.)  Process

How do you measure, analyze, and then improve organizational performance?

Describe HOW your organization MEASURES, ANALYZES, ALIGNS, reviews, and improves its PERFORMANCE through the use of data and information at all LEVELS and in all parts of your organization.

Describe HOW you SYSTEMATICALLY use the RESULTS of reviews to evaluate and improve PROCESSES.

Within your response, include answers to the following questions:

4.1a. PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT

a(1)  HOW do you select, collect, ALIGN, and INTEGRATE data and information for tracking daily operations and for tracking overall
        organizational PERFORMANCE, including progress relative to STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES and ACTION PLANS?

What are your KEY organizational PERFORMANCE MEASURES, including KEY short-term and longer-term financial MEASURES?

HOW do you use these data and information to support organizational decision making and INNOVATION?

a(2)  HOW do you select and ensure the EFFECTIVE use of KEY COMPARATIVE data and information to support operational and
        strategic decision making and INNOVATION?

a(3)  HOW do you keep your PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT SYSTEM current with business needs and directions?

HOW do you ensure that your PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT SYSTEM is sensitive to rapid or unexpected organizational or external changes?

4.1b. PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS, Review, and Improvement

a(1)  HOW do you review organizational PERFORMANCE and CAPABILITIES?

What ANALYSES do you perform to support these reviews and to ensure that conclusions are valid?

HOW do you use these reviews to assess organizational success, competitive PERFORMANCE, and progress relative to STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES and ACTION PLANS?

HOW do you use these reviews to assess your organization’s ability to rapidly respond to changing organizational needs and CHALLENGES in your operating environment?

a(2)  HOW do you translate organizational PERFORMANCE review findings into priorities for continuous and BREAKTHROUGH
        IMPROVEMENT
and into OPPORTUNITIES for INNOVATION?

HOW are these priorities and OPPORTUNITIES DEPLOYED to work group and functional-level operations throughout your organization to enable EFFECTIVE support for their decision making?

When appropriate, HOW are the priorities and OPPORTUNITIES DEPLOYED to your suppliers, PARTNERS, and COLLABORATORS to ensure organizational ALIGNMENT?

a(3) HOW do you incorporate the RESULTS of organizational PERFORMANCE reviews into the SYSTEMATIC evaluation and
       improvement of KEY PROCESSES?

Notes:

N1. PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT (4.1a) is used in fact-based decision making for setting and ALIGNING organizational directions and resource use at the work unit, KEY PROCESS, departmental, and whole organization LEVELS.

N2. COMPARATIVE data and information (4.1a[2]) are obtained by BENCHMARKING and by seeking competitive COMPARISONS. “BENCHMARKING” refers to identifying PROCESSES and RESULTS that represent best practices and PERFORMANCE for similar activities, inside or outside your organization’s industry. Competitive COMPARISONS relate your organization's PERFORMANCE to that of competitors and other organizations providing similar products and services.

N3. Organizational PERFORMANCE reviews (4.1b[1]) should be informed by organizational PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENTS, PERFORMANCE MEASURES reported throughout your Criteria Item responses, and PERFORMANCE MEASURES reviewed by SENIOR LEADERS (1.1b[2]), and they should be guided by the STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES and ACTION PLANS described in Item 2.1 and Item 2.2. The reviews also might be informed by internal or external Baldrige assessments.

N4. ANALSIS (4.1b[1]) includes examining TRENDS; organizational, industry, and technology PROJECTIONS; and COMPARISONS, cause-effect relationships, and correlations. ANALSIS should intended to support your PERFORMANCE reviews, help determine root causes, and help set priorities for resource use. Accordingly, ANALYSIS draws upon all types of data: CUSTOMER-related, financial and market, operational, and competitive.

N5. The RESULTS of organizational PERFORMANCE ANALSIS and review should contribute to organizational strategic planning in Category 2.

N6. Your organizational PERFORMANCE RESULTS should be reported in Item 7.1, Item 7.2, Item 7.3, Item 7.4, Item 7.5, and Item 7.6.

For additional description of this Item, see: 4.1 Measurement, Analysis, and Review of Organizational Performance Description.

2008 Business Nonprofit Criteria Links: 1.1 - 1.2 - 2.1 - 2.2 - 3.1 - 3.2 - 4.1 - 4.2 - 5.1 - 5.2 - 6.1 - 6.2 - 7.1 - 7.2 - 7.3 - 7.4 - 7.5 - 7.6 - P.1 - P.2

Blue Words above are hyperlinks to their definitions.

I am pleased to offer the 2008 ACTIONABLE Criteria as a no charge service to Baldrige Criteria users worldwide - Paul Steel

TOTAL INTEGRATED BUSINESS EXCELLENCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

Resources

Training

Best Processes

Application Prep

International

Seminars - Conferences

EasyApp Software

Templates

Consulting

TQI