2008 Baldrige ACTIONABLE Business, Public Sector and Other Nonprofit Criteria
Category 4: Measurement, Analysis, and Knowledge Management
(90 pts.)
The Measurement, ANALYSIS, and Knowledge Management Category
examines
HOW
your organization selects, gathers,
ANALYZES,
manages, and improves its data, information, and
KNOWLEDGE ASSETS
and
HOW
it manages its information technology. The Category also examines
HOW
your organization reviews and uses reviews to improve its
PERFORMANCE.
Item 4.1: Measurement, Analysis, and Improvement of Organizational Performance
|
Item 4.1: Measurement, Analysis, and Improvement of Organizational
Performance
(45 pts.)
|
|
How do you measure, analyze, and then improve organizational performance? |
|
Describe
HOW
your organization
MEASURES,
ANALYZES,
ALIGNS,
reviews, and improves its
PERFORMANCE
through the use of data and information at
all
LEVELS
and in all parts of your organization.
Describe
HOW
you
SYSTEMATICALLY
use the
RESULTS
of reviews to evaluate and improve
PROCESSES.
Within your response, include answers to the following questions:
4.1a.
PERFORMANCE
MEASUREMENT
a(1) HOW
do you select, collect,
ALIGN,
and
INTEGRATE
data and information for tracking daily operations and for tracking
overall
What are your
KEY
organizational
PERFORMANCE
MEASURES,
including
KEY
short-term and longer-term financial
MEASURES?
HOW
do you use these data and information to support organizational decision
making and
INNOVATION?
a(2) HOW
do you select and ensure the
EFFECTIVE
use of
KEY
COMPARATIVE
data and information to support operational and
a(3) HOW
do you keep your
PERFORMANCE
MEASUREMENT
SYSTEM
current with business needs and directions?
HOW
do you ensure that your
PERFORMANCE
MEASUREMENT
SYSTEM
is sensitive to rapid or unexpected organizational or external changes?
4.1b. PERFORMANCE
ANALYSIS,
Review, and Improvement
a(1)
HOW
do you review organizational
PERFORMANCE
and
CAPABILITIES?
What
ANALYSES
do you perform to support these reviews and to ensure that conclusions
are valid?
HOW
do you use these reviews to assess organizational success, competitive
PERFORMANCE,
and progress relative to
STRATEGIC
OBJECTIVES and
ACTION PLANS?
HOW
do you use these reviews to assess your organization’s ability to
rapidly respond to changing organizational needs and
CHALLENGES
in your operating environment?
a(2) HOW
do you translate organizational
PERFORMANCE
review findings into priorities for continuous and
BREAKTHROUGH
HOW
are these priorities and
OPPORTUNITIES
DEPLOYED
to work group and functional-level operations throughout your
organization to enable
EFFECTIVE
support for their decision making?
When appropriate,
HOW
are the priorities and
OPPORTUNITIES
DEPLOYED
to your suppliers,
PARTNERS,
and
COLLABORATORS
to ensure organizational
ALIGNMENT?
a(3) HOW
do you incorporate the
RESULTS
of
organizational
PERFORMANCE
reviews into the
SYSTEMATIC
evaluation and |
|
Notes:
N1.
PERFORMANCE
MEASUREMENT
(4.1a)
is used in
fact-based decision making for setting and
ALIGNING
organizational directions and resource use at the work unit,
KEY
PROCESS,
departmental,
and whole organization
LEVELS.
N2.
COMPARATIVE
data and information (4.1a[2]) are obtained by
BENCHMARKING
and by seeking competitive
COMPARISONS.
“BENCHMARKING”
refers to identifying
PROCESSES
and
RESULTS
that represent best practices and
PERFORMANCE
for similar activities, inside or outside your organization’s industry.
Competitive
COMPARISONS
relate your organization's
PERFORMANCE
to that of competitors and other organizations providing similar
products and services.
N3.
Organizational
PERFORMANCE
reviews (4.1b[1]) should be informed by organizational
PERFORMANCE
MEASUREMENTS,
PERFORMANCE
MEASURES
reported throughout your Criteria Item responses, and
PERFORMANCE
MEASURES
reviewed by
SENIOR LEADERS
(1.1b[2]),
and they should be guided by the
STRATEGIC
OBJECTIVES and
ACTION PLANS
described in
Item 2.1
and
Item 2.2.
The reviews also might be informed by internal or external Baldrige
assessments.
N4.
ANALSIS
(4.1b[1])
includes examining
TRENDS;
organizational, industry, and technology
PROJECTIONS;
and
COMPARISONS,
cause-effect relationships, and correlations.
ANALSIS
should intended to support your
PERFORMANCE
reviews, help determine root causes, and help set priorities for
resource use. Accordingly,
ANALYSIS
draws upon all types of data:
CUSTOMER-related,
financial and market, operational, and competitive.
N5.
The
RESULTS
of organizational
PERFORMANCE
ANALSIS
and review should contribute to organizational strategic planning in
Category 2.
N6.
Your organizational
PERFORMANCE
RESULTS
should be reported in
Item 7.1,
Item 7.2,
Item 7.3,
Item 7.4,
Item 7.5,
and
Item 7.6. |
|
For additional description of this Item, see:
4.1 Measurement, Analysis, and Review of Organizational Performance
Description. |
| 2008 Business Nonprofit Criteria Links: 1.1 - 1.2 - 2.1 - 2.2 - 3.1 - 3.2 - 4.1 - 4.2 - 5.1 - 5.2 - 6.1 - 6.2 - 7.1 - 7.2 - 7.3 - 7.4 - 7.5 - 7.6 - P.1 - P.2 |
Blue Words above are hyperlinks to their definitions.
I am pleased to offer the 2008 ACTIONABLE Criteria as a no charge service to Baldrige Criteria users worldwide - Paul Steel