BALDRIGE SCORING SYSTEM

Baldrige Scoring Guidelines and other Scoring System Guides and Tools

 

The scoring of responses to Criteria Items (Items) and Award applicant feedback are based on two evaluation dimensions: (1) Process and (2) Results. Criteria users need to furnish information relating to these dimensions. Specific factors for these dimensions are described below. Links to all Scoring Guidelines versions are provided on this page.

Process Scoring

Results Scoring


Process” refers to the methods your organization uses and improves to address the Item requirements in Categories 1–6. The four factors used to evaluate process are Approach, Deployment, Learning, and Integration (ADLI).


Approach” refers to:

- the methods used to accomplish the process

- the appropriateness of the methods to the Item requirements and the organization’s

  operating environment
- the effectiveness of your use of the methods

- the degree to which the approach is repeatable and based on reliable data and

  information (i.e., systematic)


Deployment” refers to the extent to which

- your approach is applied in addressing Item requirements relevant and important to

  your organization
- your approach is applied consistently
- your approach is used (executed) by all appropriate work units


Learning” refers to
- refining your approach through cycles of evaluation and improvement
- encouraging breakthrough change to your approach through innovation
- sharing refinements and innovations with other relevant work units and processes

  in your organization


Integration” refers to the extent to which

- your approach is aligned with your organizational needs identified in the

  Organizational Profile and other Process Items
- your measures, information, and improvement systems are complementary across

  processes and work units
- your plans, processes, results, analyses, learning, and actions are harmonized

  across processes and work units to support organization-wide goals


Results” refers to your organization’s outputs and outcomes in achieving the requirements in Items 7.1–7.6 (Category 7). The four factors used to evaluate results are Levels, Trends, Comparisons, and Integration (LeTCI).


Levels” refers to:
- your current level of performance

 

Trends” refers to
- the rate of your performance improvements or the sustainability of good performance

  (i.e., the slope of trend data)
- the breadth (i.e., the extent of deployment) of your performance results


Comparisons” refers to
- your performance relative to appropriate comparisons, such as competitors or

  organizations similar to yours
- your performance relative to benchmarks or industry leaders


Integration” refers to the extent to which

- your results measures (often through segmentation) address important customer,

  product, market, process, and action plan performance requirements identified in

  your Organizational Profile and in Process Items
- your results include valid indicators of future performance
- your results are harmonized across processes and work units to support

  organization-wide goals


Has the Baldrige Award gone out of business?

For the first time in the 30+ year history of the award, there have been no Baldrige business applicants since 2012
and Criteria degradation and impracticality are looking more and more like the primary causes

Baldrige Program Failure 2022

To put this in perspective, not one of the 20 million for-profit businesses in the United States applied for the Baldrige Award this year.

 

Source: NIST Baldrige Website

Baldrige Scoring Guidelines Improvements Needed

 

Baldrige Results Scoring Guidelines Quiz

Q: Which American document has approximately 150 more words than the other? a) the Baldrige Results Scoring Guidelines or b) Abraham Lincoln's "Gettysburg Address"?

A: The Results Scoring Guidelines have 400 words. The Gettysburg Address has 256.

Q: Which of these three terms are not used to assess results? a) 'early good', b) 'on time good', or c) 'late good'

A: If you thought this was a trick question, unfortunately you're wrong. 'Early good' is used in the 0 to 5% scoring range. Silly me. I thought getting good results early would have scored higher.

Q: Results are quantitative by nature. However qualitative and/or judgmental guideline terms are used to assess them in all scoring bands. Is this: TRUE? or FALSE?

A: TRUE. The judgmental terms "poor", "good", "good relative", "very good", "good to excellent", "excellent", and my personal favorite "early good" are used to assess the quantitative results. For 2011, the terms "good for nothing", "good enough", and "too good to be true" will be added . . . not true. Also not true is that because some people do not understand what "early good" means, "on-time good", and "late good" will also be added.

Q: "World class" was once part of the Results Scoring Guidelines: TRUE? or FALSE?

A: TRUE. The early guidelines required winners to demonstrate 'world class' results to score in the highest scoring range.

Q: Which of the following terms are not used to assess the quantity of results? "no", "any", "few", "little", "little or no", "limited", "limited or no", "some", "some to many", "mainly", "many", "many to most", "majority", "most to fully", or "fully"

A: Believe it or not, "some to many" and "most to fully" are not in the scoring guidelines. "Mainly"???

Q: Not one Examiner knows how to interpret the relative meaning of these results assessment terms: "important", "high priority", and "key". TRUE? or FALSE?

A: I don't know how many but I do know that there is at least one who has never been able to figure it out (LOL).

Baldrige improvement accelerated and made practical with tools and resources from the most experienced source

MISSION: Accelerating organizational improvement beyond the capabilities of all Business Excellence approaches combined. Paul

 

Baldrige Scoring System